Inferno

Tom Hanks is back in this third outing as Professor of Iconology Robert Langdon. This time he finds himself in a hospital in Florence with no knowledge of how he got there from Boston, which is last recountable memory. He is being tended to by Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones) a doctor at the hospital and a fan of Langdons so after an attempt is made on his life she aides his escape. When he finds a container in his pocket containing an skewed picture of Dantes inferno they manage to link the drawing to a geneticist Bertrand Zobrist (Ben Foster) whos vocal and extremist views on overpopulation of the world has him on the watch list of many government agencies.

As Langdon realises that he is a wanted man his amnesia causes him to mistrust everybody so he goes on the run, along with Brooks to try and work out why he is in possession of the drawing and what links it to Zobrist. So begins the hunt as Langdon unravels the clues to uncover the truth all the while having the authorities on his tail including the mysterious Vayentha (Ana Ularu), who has the most purposeful walk I’ve seen since Robert Patrick as the T-1000.

inferno-3

While I have read both the DaVinci Code and Angels And Demons I have not read this novel so I can only assume that it is reasonably faithful to the source material. If this is the case then I hope that the plot line makes more sense on print as I found this to be an awful mess of a storyline. I won’t give anything away in terms of a spoiler but it’s fairly common knowledge that this movie revolves around the potential release of a virus which will wipe out a large portion of the human population so if this was an agenda for somebody who was in possession of such a bacterial agent I would expect that they would just release the virus. Instead we have a convoluted mix of clues, each leading to the next step towards finding the location of the virus which is waiting to be released. It’s a glorified version of how the villains in the early James Bond movies always took the time to explain their plans for world domination to the character before killing him.

inferno-2

This is only the beginning of my gripe. I know that Langdon is a well know person in certain circles but I doubt he is famous enough to be allowed to pass though closed off areas of tourist attractions and not have anybody approach him regarding what he may be doing, yet he seems to have free reign to run around said areas in search of clues with it even going so far as to being able to take an exhibit without recourse, the World Health Organisation are now almost militaristic in their approach to things, crack shot hit-men suddenly can’t hit a barn door with a banjo, a believable twist but one that was so obvious that I called it twenty minutes into the film, then further twists which are extremely far fetched and a climax so ridiculous. The whole thing felt like an amateur hour idea in its execution.

inferno-4

The premise itself is fine. Humanity is ruining the planet, like a disease and the only way to solve the problem is to eliminate the many to save the few, no problem with that concept but the whole thing just left like it was a lazy adaptation of a story with no real sense of danger or drama considering the supposed consequences.

There is a lot more wrong with this film and I could go on but I’ve said about as much as I can without giving the movie away, just in case you do decide to check it out. Considering this is directed by Ron Howard it’s a very poor effort and Tom Hanks felt like he was phoning it in as the usual charisma and intensity he brings was missing, which is not something I can ever recall saying before so I can only blame the material on that. The rest of the cast as similarly wasted with Omar Sy & Ben Foster completely underused and apart from Hanks & Jones the only person who stood out was Irrfan Khan as Harry Sims, head of the unknown group who are chasing Langdon. I’m not sure if it was the actors performance or his lines which were the reason for the humour in the role, whichever it was, it was one of the few bright spots in a poor film which is overlong, preachy and not as good as the previous two movies, neither of which was great either.

In a year full of disappointing movies this one is down the lower echelons of that list.

DJ Speaks Rating: 4 Out Of 10

© Darren Jones 2016

War On Everyone

Set in New Mexico, War On Everyone is the story of a pair of corrupt police officers. Terry Monroe (Alexander Skarsgard) is an act on impulse type of guy who tends to think with his fists and has been know to have a drink or two in his time. Along with his partner Bob Bolaño (Michael Pena) the more stable of the two, if there is such a thing in the partnership, they lie and cheat their way through the day in order to get what they need and do what they want with the bonus being that they may actually catch some criminals and uphold the law along the way on the off chance. It really is a case of bad cop, worse cop and needless to say they are not flavour of the week with their exasperated Lieutenant, Gerry Stanton (Paul Reiser) who is trying his best to bring them inline without much success so they are on their final warning about their antics when they come across a potential theft being planned which seems to be linked to some of their local underworld contacts working for a new player in town. As their investigation gathers momentum so does the body count but when blackmail and framing are part of your daily routine you are bound to run into somebody just as dangerous as you are so this leads them to a showdown with the ever so British James Mangan (Theo James) acting like the lord of the manor and his creepy Alex DeLarge like, henchman Birdwell (Caleb Landry Jones).

war-on-everyone-4

image Courtesy Of thetheologians.net

Brought to us by John Michael McDonagh who also wrote and directed Cavalry and The Guard, he works again with Chris Clark, Flora Fernandez-Marengo and Elizabeth Eves so the similar dark themes are present once more as all the characters in the movie are flawed, some more so than others. With the use of 1970’s style vehicles, complete with power slides and wheel spins there is a very Streets Of San Francisco feel about some scenes and I kept expecting to hear Sabotage by the Beastie Boys kick in but essentially it’s a buddy cop movie so, although humorous in parts it suffered from a lack of originality which is a disappointment given the directors previous efforts.

war-on-everyone-3

Image Courtesy Of Askarsjustsoswedish

The lack of chemistry between the two leads was also a big factor, I never bought the relationship as genuine and the friendship didn’t have the feel of a real camaraderie built up by working together, especially considering it should be stronger then most bonds given the fine line they are both walking where you need to know your friend has your back at all times. Couple this with the fact that a lot of the comedy felt forced and crude for the sake of it the film making had a very lazy feel about it.

war-on-everyone-2

Image Courtesy Of Askarsjustsoswedish

Although Skarsgard was the more interesting of the movies characters and is the most memorable part of the film, all others are either parodies of similar genre characters or just down right forgettable. Even the dialogue which was very intellectual at times, felt like it was trying to match a speech from a Quentin Tarantino movie and instead of enhancing the characters it felt alien to the general tone of the rest of the film which is more madcap and off kilter. Despite the fact that they are not likable characters there is enough humanity left in the duo to do the right thing and with Skarsgard in particular there is a redemption in the fact that he is a good Samaritan at heart behind the tough, self hating, exterior even if his interaction is more like an owner to pet rather than human to human.

I was hoping for much more when I first seen the trailer and, although it does have its moments, it’s lack of cohesion and the omission of any real memorable moments make it a cast away watch. Yes, you will get a few laughs at some scenes but the writing and acting talent involved are capable of so much more.

DJ Speaks Rating: 4.5 Out Of 10  

© Darren Jones 2016

The Girl On The Train

Based on the hugely successful 2015 book by Paula Hawkins, The Girl on the Train stars Emily Blunt as Rachel Watson who travels to work in New York City by rail each day. While commuting she passes the home of a seemingly happy couple, she wonders who this couple are and imagines the life they lead which may seem strange until we realise that Rachael is a broken woman and these fantasies are the main drive keeping her going each day as her personal life is a shambles since her marriage to her ex-husband Tom (Justin Theroux) ended in divorce when she found out that he was cheating on her.

the-girl-on-the-train-3

As we find out more about Rachael we also realise that the train also passes by her old home where Tom now lives with this same woman Anne (Rebecca Ferguson), who is now his wife, and their baby.  So the voyeuristic nature of her commute is not just random and she is struggling badly to cope and move on with her life.

We are also introduced to Megan Hipwell (Haley Bennett) who is unknowingly the feature of Rachaels fascination from her passenger window. She is married to Scott (Luke Evans) and on the outset they do indeed seem like a perfect couple but Megan too has a troubled past and is seeing a councilor to deal with her seeming inability to want to settle and need to keep changing things up in her life to keep her going so she is unhappy in her relationship with Scott who seems to be controlling and aggressive.

the-girl-on-the-train-4

When Rachel spots Megan with a different man on the balcony of the house one day she is both shocked and intrigued but when she later learns that Megan has gone missing she realises that she may have a vital clue in the case. Thanks to her instability as a person however she is deemed an unworthy witness. Rachael takes it upon herself to investigate her sighting further which puts her in the direct line of Scott, Tom, Anne and the police but having found purpose in her life she begins to find some clarity in her memories and it soon becomes apparent that all the characters in the tale have more to them than initially shown and with the suspect list growing there are many people who had motive to harm Megan.

the-girl-on-the-train-2

Emily Blunt really gave her all in the film and her believable performance as the broken woman was deserving of a better outcome as the movie suffered from trying to hard to be a clever thriller along the lines of David Finchers Gone Girl but the material didn;t seem to have the strength to allow for that stance. Not having read the book I cannot comment on how faithful the movie is but while director Tate Taylor deserves credit for keeping the suspense tight in the second part of the film it may have been better if a female director was at the helm given that the tale is essentially about three women and their bizarrely intertwined relationship, plus with the themes of babies running through the whole story, since each of the main characters seems to have some form of past or present link with pregnancy or parenthood, it may have been more suited to have somebody who had gone through the act of childbirth behind the camera. However, in saying that, in terms of the story, it was a good way of giving the character relationships some meaning and purpose rather than just being a set of random circumstances.

It’s difficult to be spoiler free and yet give some insight into this movie as it’s best watched with no knowledge of the character since the layering of each is one of the movies biggest strengths therefore if you have read the book you may not be as intrigued as I was by the set up. Yet, even without that knowledge, while it is a decent thriller with many twists and turns that unravel as snippets of information are revealed, characters traits are peeled back and the reality within the story becomes clearer as Rachaels consciousness itself becomes unclouded, the slow burning tension is not given the finale it deserves as the crescendo of drama ends with the climax of a faulty firework.

DJ Speaks Rating: 5 Out Of 10

©Darren Jones 2016

Miss Peregrine’s Home For Peculiar Children

Tim Burtons recent efforts with the Alice In Wonderland and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory tales have not endeared me to him in a way that his earlier work such as Edward Scissorhands did but at least there’s no Johnny Depp appearance this time.

Instead we follow Jake Portman (Asa Butterfield), a loner of a boy who feels like he doesn’t belong and is lost in life. He has always had a very close relationship with his grandfather Abe (Terence Stamp) who has tried to shield his nephew from his apathetic parents through his tales of travelling the world and in particular with his re-counting of a school, run by a woman who can transform into a bird called Miss Peregrine where the children are all unusual and have certain traits that make them stand out. Jake has never been sure if these tales are figments of his grandfathers imagination so while the rest of society believes that his grandfather is losing his marbles and has always been a story-teller Jake believes that there just may be something in these stories. Then, when Abe dies under suspicious circumstances, he begins to suspect that something sinister may have occurred so he convinces his father Franklin (Chris O’Dowd), with the help of his psychologist to head to Wales as part of this therapy to deal with his grief over the death. While there, Jake wants to establish first hand if there was any reality to the stories.

miss-peregrine-2

Burtons take on the Ransom Riggs novel has all the ingredients to be a dark tale which is usually right up his street but it falls a bit flat as, despite the potential the unusual ‘gifts’ that the children have it’s all been seen before (Professor Xavier school for gifted mutants) and for all of their unusualness there is nothing really memorable about them. We have Emma (Ella Purnell) who can manipulate air, Olive Abroholos Elephanta (Lauren McCrostie) who is a pyrokinetic, Fiona Frauenfeld (Georgia Pemberton) who can control nature, Claire Densmore (Raffiella Chapman) who has a mouth on the back of her head, Millard Nullings (Cameron King) an invisible boy, Bronwyn Buntley (Pixie Davies) a small child with super human strength and a few other all of whom are cute and charming but nothing special in reality. However the most original and interesting character for me was Enoch O’Connor (Finlay MacMillan) whose gift is being able to bring inanimate objects to life in a kind of reverse Taxidermy yet is given little to do with his skill for most of the movie and spends the majority of the film acting as the grumpy older kid who feels threatened by the new arrival and his developing bond with Emma.

A big problem for me was the central character of Jake, not that there was anything wrong with the acting as Butterfield was fine in the role, but Jake himself who is the only person who can see the Hollows and thus acts as a protector for the group, always felt like an outsider. His work around to allow the group see the creatures was fairly obvious and didn’t really require and special talents so he felt a bit unnecessary and only really served as the conduit from the past to the present. Plus we never got to see any real acting range from Butterfield and considering his performances in The Boy In the Striped Pyjamas and Hugo that was quite disappointing.

miss-peregrine-3

The savior of the film is Miss Peregrine (Eva Green) or, Alma LeFay Peregrine to give the character her full name, who is both mysterious and captivating as the pipe smoking head of the house who controls the time loop which keeps the children safe and also holds the knowledge to Jake’s background. Green does a great job in making the character her own as her mannerisms, speech patterns and clothing all paint the picture of somebody who is much more than she seems upon initial impression. Warm and caring one moment but who will take whatever measures she need to in order to keep the children from harm.

miss-peregrine-4

Also, adding his two cents as Mr.Barron is Samuel L.Jackson who once again shows that you could put him in any rubbish and he would still be able to bring elements of class to a role, as he is both terrifying and hilarious in equal measures as the eyeball eating, slightly mad leader of the evil Wights

The movie suffers from not being one thing or another as the supposed good versus evil battle only ever really manifests itself during the climactic finale on Blackpool pier but even then it’s played with a certain level of comedy so that it never really feels like there is any sense of serious drama in the situation which leaves the movie as a children’s romp with typical Burton dark tones but no real sense of adventure about what could have been an exciting time travel story with characters who have special powers, but then again I have just described a kids version Days Of Future Past?

DJ Speaks Rating: 4.5 Out Of 10

©  Darren Jones 2016

Deepwater Horizon

Director Peter Berg brings us the tale of the 2010 events upon the Deepwater Horizon, a semi submersible offshore drilling unit, which resulted in the worst environmental disaster in the United States and during which eleven people lost their life.

Essentially told in two parts we start by meeting the main players, finding out a bit about said people and their lives outside of work. Mike Williams (Mark Wahlberg) is a general handyman and fixer on the rig, whom we see with his wife Felicia (Kate Hudson) and daughter and he comes across an everyday down to earth family man, Andrea Fleytas (Gina Rodriguez) who drives the rig and shows some chops by giving as good as she gets in the male dominated scenario and the experienced manager of the rig Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell) who runs the ship but is liked and respected by his crew. There are also a number of BP employees on board who are worried that the project is falling behind schedule and money is being lost, central to this is Donald Vidrine (John Malkovich) who is at loggerheads with Harrell over the slow progress but all in all the picture is painted of just another regular day and unremarkable shift change.

deepwater-horizon-2

The second part switches to the drilling unit and is all about the occurrence and aftermath of the incident. We find out that there are a number of parts and items which are not working correctly and that the pressure is on all parties as the project is running at a big loss so the BP personnel are keen to push on with the drilling and are taking short cuts around testing regimes while Harrell and his team are unsure that the drilling can continue safely and are reluctant to continue until the proper tests are run. The build up is very well done slowly peeling back the chain of events which, when coupled together lead to a drill test falsely showing results which would indicate that it is safe to proceed but unknown to the people aboard the chain reaction which leads to the blow out has already kicked in, the fuse on the ticking time bomb is lit and a disaster is imminent.

The Berg & Wahlberg partnership, which we seen in Lone Survivor, once again works well and Berg gets the best out of Wahlberg who once again shows us that there is more to his acting than his comedic timing and that, when he is on form he can take centre stage. It is great to have Russell back close to his best and what he does here he does with ease yet the performance still has the gravitas it requires. When you add in Malkovich who gives a great sleazy performance as the BP executive who is all about the monetary return for the company there is a good acting base to work off and the verbal exchange scenes between Malkovich and Russell are excellent.

Unfortunately despite all the early work I still felt very little empathy with the characters. Yes, there were heroes, signs of great camaraderie between these workers who spend weeks together in the middle of the ocean, tales of self-sacrifice and lives being put in danger to help others but rather than feeling like real people I still felt that I was watching actors in a movie and despite the terrible situation that was occurring I never got to really caring about the fate of the characters in a way that a disaster movie really should suck you into doing.

deepwater-horizon-3

On the up side, while the movie could have become bogged down with technical details I always felt that I understood what was going on with the machinery and why the disaster occurred, so credit must be given for the moments of exposition which gave us an inside to how the drilling worked, particularly the use of Walhbergs daughters school assignment utilising a fizzy drink to show the pressure that drilling occurs under and once it kicks off it is one of the most spectacular disaster sequences I’ve ever seen. I’m not sure how much of the filming was done through CGI but the explosions and fires felt very real and there were very few occasions where I was taken out of the moment. Each creak could be the one which finally brings the structure tumbling into the sea which adds a great tension to the situation. Both the sound editing and technical camera was excellent with some very good underwater scenes around the structure base and the inside of the mechanical parts of the drill giving some insight into the unseen workings of the set up.

The last few moments film back on shore, dealing with the aftermath of the situation also falls a little flat after the intensity of the rigs demise so while not the greatest film you will see this year it’s worth checking out for the great portrayal of the disaster itself, think Backdraft meets The Towering Inferno for the modern age.

DJ Speaks Rating: 5.5 Out Of 10

© Darren Jones 2016

Bridget Jones’s Baby

The third installment in the Bridget Jones saga sees her reaching her 43rd birthday, still single but with her new career as a TV producer going well she is a lot more upbeat than usual until a ‘Happy Birthday’ call from her mother reminds her that the opportunity for having a family is running out which gets the cogs in her brain turning towards parenthood even if there is still a glaring gap in the form of a man to fill out the biological requirements. Two chance encounters soon sort that out however as she attends a music festival, gets very drunk and ends up sleeping with an American stranger (Patrick Dempsey) and shortly afterwards she attends a Christening where she is the Godmother and old flame Mark Darcy (Colin Firth) is Godfather which throws them back together and when she finds out that the now married Mark is soon to be divorced they too end up sleeping together. Inevitably she soon finds out she is pregnant but is unsure which of the two men is the father and when the American stranger turns out to be Jack Qwant, a self made millionaire through his successful invention of a popular dating site who ends up on the TV programme she produces her quandary is complete.

I wasn’t a massive fan of either if the first two although, if the box office figures are any indication, they seem to be very popular and I’m sure this one will be no different even if it is a similar plot. Bridget ends up in varying hilarious situations while she needs to choose between one of two men both of whom fall for her quirky character and vie for her attention. Forgetting the ironic twist of him appearing in the first two movies, I always found that this character was the female equivalent of the characters Hugh Grant made his fame playing. Socially awkward, fopping around saying ‘Bugger’ a lot.

This time Bridget needs to pick between the dynamic handsome American millionaire Jack and the ever so British, handsome gentleman lawyer in Mark. Both of whom are eager to play the parent role and are unaware of the potential fact that they may not even be the father or the child as Bridget tries to keep her situation a secret. Zellweger has done a great job in making this character her own over the years and does not disappoint in her third outing and despite the fact that she has shied away from taking new roles over the last five years or so there is no obvious loss to her talents. She also has able assistance this time from her friend and news anchor Miranda (Sarah Solemani) who is a very bad influence, but in a good way and gives some very funny comic relief moments.

There is also a small but memorable performance by Emma Thompson as Dr.Rawlings who shows she has lost none of her comic talent or timing through the years and both Gemma Jones and Jim Broadbent are back as Bridget mother and father to add some more comedy especially as her mother is running in a local election with her main ethos being on family values all of which add to the comedic tone of the tale.

Unfortunately the movie runs out of steam a bit towards the final third with the predictably farcical, water breaking, dash for the hospital, epidural and labor pain jokes we have seen before. But in that lies the key, there is nothing new within the film but it feels like wearing comfortable clothes, there may be nothing fancy going on but there’s no call for it either so it’s like two hours spent in a happy zone where you know what is happening, what is likely to happen but you are more than happy to be there and tag along for the ride. So despite the slushy ending and formulaic plot you still find yourself entertained.

DJ Speaks Rating: 5.5 Out Of 10